Piotr Bar
Sabina Galiniak
ID
 Email src
Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher
ID
 Email src
Rafal Filip
ID
 Email src
David Aebisher
ID
 Email src
Clinical Department of Pathomorphology, Clinical Hospital No. 2, Rzeszów, Poland
Department of Biochemistry and General Chemistry Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland
Department of Biochemistry and General Chemistry, Medical College of the University of Rzeszow, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland
Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszow University, Rzeszow, Poland
Department of Photomedicine and Physical Chemistry, Medical College of Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, Poland
Received: 29 October 2018 / Accepted: 29 November 2018 / Published: 30 June 2019

Abstract

Introduction. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) play a widespread role in tissue modelling. GAG polymers may affect several receptor pathways in parallel.

Aim. To present difference in concentration of GAG in healthy and cancer tissues.

Material and methods. The literature search was performed nd reviewed using selected keywords.

Results. We revieved the methods of detection various types of glycans measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Conclusion. MRI methodology provides an efficient tool forstudy of cellular composition. The use T1 aof T2 measurements to study cancer tissue is a promising assay.

 

Cite

Bar P, Galiniak S, Bartusik-Aebisher D, Filip R, Aebisher D. Glycosaminoglycan concentration in cancer tissue. Eur J Clin Exp Med. 2019;17(2):175–178. doi: 10.15584/ejcem.2019.2.12

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited